Editorial Process

How we research, write, and review every guide

Every page on this site is built on peer-reviewed evidence and reviewed before publication. This page is the public record of how we do that — and how to flag corrections.

Our 4-stage editorial pipeline

1

Research

Every article begins with a literature scan in PubMed and at least three position stands or guidelines from major bodies (ACSM, ISSN, NIH, WHO, CDC). We work backward from the highest-quality evidence: meta-analyses and systematic reviews first, RCTs second, observational studies third, and expert position stands as anchoring frameworks.

2

Writing

Drafts cite sources inline. Quantitative claims (calorie counts, percentages, multipliers) include the equation or study they came from. Health claims are stated with the appropriate uncertainty (±10% accuracy, individual variation, etc.).

3

Fact-check

Before publication, every numerical claim is verified against the cited source. Tables (calorie charts, BMR by weight) are generated from the published equations, not summarized from another website.

4

Review

All guides receive editorial review before publication and are attributed to the editorial team. When an article has been reviewed by a named expert (such as a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist), that reviewer's name and credentials appear at the bottom of the article. Articles without a named reviewer carry only the editorial team attribution.

Sources we trust

We cite primary literature wherever possible. When we summarize a position, we link to the originating organization. We never cite forum posts, social-media claims, or non-peer-reviewed publications as evidence for health claims.

Update cadence

  • Annual review. Every article is re-read and updated at least once every 12 months. The "Last reviewed" date at the bottom of each guide is always the actual most recent review.
  • Evidence-driven updates. When a major position stand is published or revised (for example, an updated ISSN protein recommendation), we revise affected guides within 60 days.
  • Reader-flagged corrections. We respond to correction reports within 7 days. Corrections are made transparently with a date stamp.

Found an error? Tell us.

We take accuracy seriously. If a number, claim, or citation looks wrong, please email us with the article URL and a link or DOI to the source you'd like us to consider. We'll investigate and reply within 7 days.

What this site is — and isn't

This site is an evidence-based educational resource on energy expenditure, nutrition, and body composition. Our calculators implement equations from peer-reviewed research and our guides explain the science behind them.

This site is not medical advice and is not a substitute for evaluation by a clinician or registered dietitian. For medical conditions affecting metabolism (PCOS, thyroid disease, diabetes, eating disorders), pregnancy, or any condition requiring personalized nutrition planning, please consult a qualified healthcare professional.